MN · ranked by public data
Choose from the evidence-led ranking categories currently published for this state.
Catch rates are compared only inside the same species, protocol, gear, unit, survey phase, and sampled population. Minnesota also requires the same lake class, published normal range, standard summer month, and exact DOW identity. Every peer-backed system restarts at #1. Scores weight lake-scale opportunity 55%, survey rate 35%, and recency 10%. Documented acreage and public access are eligibility gates; unsupported survey evidence stays visible but unranked.
693 numerically ranked · 728 evidence-qualified
standard summer july mn class 24 standard gill nets normal 1 2 to 6 3 catch per effort (fish per net set) system preview
91 numerically ranked · 228 evidence-qualified
spring spawning mn class 22 standard night bass electrofishing catch per effort (fish per hour) system preview
749 numerically ranked · 774 evidence-qualified
standard summer july mn class 24 standard trap nets normal 7 5 to 62 5 catch per effort (fish per net set) system preview
468 numerically ranked · 683 evidence-qualified
spring spawning mn class 24 standard night bass electrofishing catch per effort (fish per hour) system preview
729 numerically ranked · 755 evidence-qualified
standard summer july mn class 24 standard gill nets normal 1 5 to 7 3 catch per effort (fish per net set) system preview
Catch-per-effort ranks compare only exact compatible systems, and every system with eligible peers restarts at #1. Scores weight lake-scale opportunity 55%, survey rate 35%, and recency 10%. Unsupported species and methods remain documented but unranked. Lakes without documented acreage and verified public or shore access are excluded.