Skip to main content
LakeListChoose a state
LakesExploreBest LakesSearch
Favorites
LakeList

Explore U.S. lakes with source-linked facts, maps, public access information, and practical trip-planning tools.

LakeList on Facebook

Footer navigation

Explore

  • Browse lakes by state
  • Search lakes
  • Saved lakes

Learn

  • Lake of the Week
  • Lake guides
  • Reading a depth map
  • Wisconsin depth maps

LakeList

  • About LakeList
  • Data sources and methodology
  • What data we have

Policies

  • Privacy
  • Terms of use

Lake information can change. Verify regulations, access, weather, and water conditions with official sources.

© 2026 LakeList

LakeList
StateMinnesota
Browse all states
AlabamaRankings not publishedALAlaskaRankings not publishedAKArizonaRankings not publishedAZArkansasRankings not publishedARCaliforniaRankings not publishedCAColoradoRankings not publishedCOConnecticutRankings not publishedCTDelawareRankings not publishedDEFloridaRankings not publishedFLGeorgiaRankings not publishedGAHawaiiRankings not publishedHIIdahoRankings not publishedIDIllinoisRankings not publishedILIndianasuperlatives rankingsINIowaRankings not publishedIAKansasRankings not publishedKSKentuckyRankings not publishedKYLouisianaRankings not publishedLAMaineRankings not publishedMEMarylandRankings not publishedMDMassachusettsRankings not publishedMAMichigansuperlatives rankingsMIMinnesotafishing, superlatives rankingsMNMississippiRankings not publishedMSMissouriRankings not publishedMOMontanaRankings not publishedMTNebraskaRankings not publishedNENevadaRankings not publishedNVNew HampshireRankings not publishedNHNew JerseyRankings not publishedNJNew MexicoRankings not publishedNMNew Yorksuperlatives rankingsNYNorth CarolinaRankings not publishedNCNorth DakotaRankings not publishedNDOhioRankings not publishedOHOklahomaRankings not publishedOKOregonRankings not publishedORPennsylvaniaRankings not publishedPARhode IslandRankings not publishedRISouth CarolinaRankings not publishedSCSouth DakotaRankings not publishedSDTennesseeRankings not publishedTNTexassuperlatives rankingsTXUtahRankings not publishedUTVermontRankings not publishedVTVirginiaRankings not publishedVAWashingtonRankings not publishedWAWest VirginiaRankings not publishedWVWisconsinfishing, swimming, superlatives rankingsWIWyomingRankings not publishedWY
LakesExploreBest LakesStoriesSearch
Favorites
Minnesota›Best lakes›Northern Pike›Wright County

MN · ranked by public data

Best Northern Pike Lakes by DNR Survey System and Lake-Scale Opportunity in Wright County, Minnesota

34 Wright County lakes have exact-water DNR survey evidence for northern pike; 34 lakes with status, survey, or report evidence met our criteria, out of 162 documented lakes in the county. Updated July 2026.

  1. Ranked within standard summer august mn class 24 standard gill nets normal 1 5 to 7 3 catch per effort (fish per net set) — ranks restart at 1

    198.9system score
    375 acres

    Wright County, MN

    Lake Ann

    limited
    45.03, -94.05375 acresVerified public accessnorthern pike, black crappie

    98.9 within-system score · 4,129.4 lake-scale opportunity index · 11 fish/net set · 2016 DNR survey

    How this within-system rank was determined
    • Within-system score: 98.9/100
    • Lake scale (55%): opportunity index 4,129.4 (11 fish/net set × 375 acres; not a fish count)
    • Survey rate (35%): 11 fish/net set
    • Survey recency (10%): 2016
    • Survey method: Minnesota DNR standard gill nets, lake class 24, standard summer august
    • Minnesota DNR lake class 24 normal range 1.5-7.3 fish/net set
    • DNR abundance label: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • DNR fisheries survey evidence: Recorded in DNR fisheries survey (northern pike)
    • Species fishing reports: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • Stocking history: not covered by this ranking dataset
  2. 277.9system score
    362 acres

    Wright County, MN

    Granite Lake

    limited
    45.19, -94.11362 acresVerified public accessnorthern pike, black crappie

    77.9 within-system score · 2,412.3 lake-scale opportunity index · 6.67 fish/net set · 2024 DNR survey

    How this within-system rank was determined
    • Within-system score: 77.9/100
    • Lake scale (55%): opportunity index 2,412.3 (6.67 fish/net set × 362 acres; not a fish count)
    • Survey rate (35%): 6.67 fish/net set
    • Survey recency (10%): 2024
    • Survey method: Minnesota DNR standard gill nets, lake class 24, standard summer august
    • Minnesota DNR lake class 24 normal range 1.5-7.3 fish/net set
    • DNR abundance label: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • DNR fisheries survey evidence: Recorded in DNR fisheries survey (northern pike)
    • Species fishing reports: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • Stocking history: not covered by this ranking dataset
  3. 377.6system score
    553 acres

    Wright County, MN

    Cokato Lake

    limited
    45.11, -94.17553 acresVerified public accessnorthern pike, black crappie

    77.6 within-system score · 3,073.5 lake-scale opportunity index · 5.56 fish/net set · 2024 DNR survey

    How this within-system rank was determined
    • Within-system score: 77.6/100
    • Lake scale (55%): opportunity index 3,073.5 (5.56 fish/net set × 553 acres; not a fish count)
    • Survey rate (35%): 5.56 fish/net set
    • Survey recency (10%): 2024
    • Survey method: Minnesota DNR standard gill nets, lake class 24, standard summer august
    • Minnesota DNR lake class 24 normal range 1.5-7.3 fish/net set
    • DNR abundance label: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • DNR fisheries survey evidence: Recorded in DNR fisheries survey (northern pike)
    • Species fishing reports: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • Stocking history: not covered by this ranking dataset
  4. 476.5system score
    745 acres

    Wright County, MN

    Howard Lake

    limited
    45.07, -94.07745 acresVerified public accessnorthern pike, black crappie

    76.5 within-system score · 3,479.2 lake-scale opportunity index · 4.67 fish/net set · 2024 DNR survey

    How this within-system rank was determined
    • Within-system score: 76.5/100
    • Lake scale (55%): opportunity index 3,479.2 (4.67 fish/net set × 745 acres; not a fish count)
    • Survey rate (35%): 4.67 fish/net set
    • Survey recency (10%): 2024
    • Survey method: Minnesota DNR standard gill nets, lake class 24, standard summer august
    • Minnesota DNR lake class 24 normal range 1.5-7.3 fish/net set
    • DNR abundance label: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • DNR fisheries survey evidence: Recorded in DNR fisheries survey (northern pike)
    • Species fishing reports: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • Stocking history: not covered by this ranking dataset
  5. 556.5system score
    1,552 acres

    Wright County, MN

    Buffalo Lake

    available
    45.16, -93.891,552 acres | 33 ft maxVerified public accessnorthern pike, black crappie

    56.5 within-system score · 2,483 lake-scale opportunity index · 1.6 fish/net set · 1988 DNR survey

    How this within-system rank was determined
    • Within-system score: 56.5/100
    • Lake scale (55%): opportunity index 2,483 (1.6 fish/net set × 1,552 acres; not a fish count)
    • Survey rate (35%): 1.6 fish/net set
    • Survey recency (10%): 1988
    • Survey method: Minnesota DNR standard gill nets, lake class 24, standard summer august
    • Minnesota DNR lake class 24 normal range 1.5-7.3 fish/net set
    • DNR abundance label: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • DNR fisheries survey evidence: Recorded in DNR fisheries survey (northern pike)
    • Species fishing reports: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • Stocking history: not covered by this ranking dataset
  6. 651.9system score
    123 acres

    Wright County, MN

    Camp Lake

    available
    45.16, -94.09123 acres | 52 ft maxVerified public accessnorthern pike, black crappie

    51.9 within-system score · 613.8 lake-scale opportunity index · 5 fish/net set · 2018 DNR survey

    How this within-system rank was determined
    • Within-system score: 51.9/100
    • Lake scale (55%): opportunity index 613.8 (5 fish/net set × 123 acres; not a fish count)
    • Survey rate (35%): 5 fish/net set
    • Survey recency (10%): 2018
    • Survey method: Minnesota DNR standard gill nets, lake class 24, standard summer august
    • Minnesota DNR lake class 24 normal range 1.5-7.3 fish/net set
    • DNR abundance label: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • DNR fisheries survey evidence: Recorded in DNR fisheries survey (northern pike)
    • Species fishing reports: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • Stocking history: not covered by this ranking dataset
  7. 750.8system score
    196 acres

    Wright County, MN

    Lake Mary

    limited
    45.25, -93.99196 acresVerified public accessnorthern pike, black crappie

    50.8 within-system score · 750.8 lake-scale opportunity index · 3.83 fish/net set · 2017 DNR survey

    How this within-system rank was determined
    • Within-system score: 50.8/100
    • Lake scale (55%): opportunity index 750.8 (3.83 fish/net set × 196 acres; not a fish count)
    • Survey rate (35%): 3.83 fish/net set
    • Survey recency (10%): 2017
    • Survey method: Minnesota DNR standard gill nets, lake class 24, standard summer august
    • Minnesota DNR lake class 24 normal range 1.5-7.3 fish/net set
    • DNR abundance label: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • DNR fisheries survey evidence: Recorded in DNR fisheries survey (northern pike)
    • Species fishing reports: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • Stocking history: not covered by this ranking dataset
  8. 850.0system score
    253 acres

    Wright County, MN

    Lake Charlotte

    limited
    45.15, -93.75253 acresVerified public accessnorthern pike, black crappie

    50.0 within-system score · 1,010.1 lake-scale opportunity index · 4 fish/net set · 1976 DNR survey

    How this within-system rank was determined
    • Within-system score: 50.0/100
    • Lake scale (55%): opportunity index 1,010.1 (4 fish/net set × 253 acres; not a fish count)
    • Survey rate (35%): 4 fish/net set
    • Survey recency (10%): 1976
    • Survey method: Minnesota DNR standard gill nets, lake class 24, standard summer august
    • Minnesota DNR lake class 24 normal range 1.5-7.3 fish/net set
    • DNR abundance label: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • DNR fisheries survey evidence: Recorded in DNR fisheries survey (northern pike)
    • Species fishing reports: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • Stocking history: not covered by this ranking dataset
  9. 943.5system score
    139 acres

    Wright County, MN

    Indian Lake

    limited
    45.31, -94.03139 acresVerified public accessnorthern pike, black crappie

    43.5 within-system score · 487.5 lake-scale opportunity index · 3.5 fish/net set · 2017 DNR survey

    How this within-system rank was determined
    • Within-system score: 43.5/100
    • Lake scale (55%): opportunity index 487.5 (3.5 fish/net set × 139 acres; not a fish count)
    • Survey rate (35%): 3.5 fish/net set
    • Survey recency (10%): 2017
    • Survey method: Minnesota DNR standard gill nets, lake class 24, standard summer august
    • Minnesota DNR lake class 24 normal range 1.5-7.3 fish/net set
    • DNR abundance label: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • DNR fisheries survey evidence: Recorded in DNR fisheries survey (northern pike)
    • Species fishing reports: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • Stocking history: not covered by this ranking dataset
  10. 1043.2system score
    639 acres

    Wright County, MN

    Collinwood Lake

    limited
    45.05, -94.26639 acresVerified public accessnorthern pike, black crappie

    43.2 within-system score · 1,277.9 lake-scale opportunity index · 2 fish/net set · 1951 DNR survey

    How this within-system rank was determined
    • Within-system score: 43.2/100
    • Lake scale (55%): opportunity index 1,277.9 (2 fish/net set × 639 acres; not a fish count)
    • Survey rate (35%): 2 fish/net set
    • Survey recency (10%): 1951
    • Survey method: Minnesota DNR standard gill nets, lake class 24, standard summer august
    • Minnesota DNR lake class 24 normal range 1.5-7.3 fish/net set
    • DNR abundance label: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • DNR fisheries survey evidence: Recorded in DNR fisheries survey (northern pike)
    • Species fishing reports: not covered by this ranking dataset
    • Stocking history: not covered by this ranking dataset
RankLakeCountyAcresSystem scorePrimary score signalSurvey measurementMetric yearDNR statusNorthern Pike stocking
11Eagle LakeWright19124.5index 223.31.17 fish/net set2016No record—
12Constance LakeWright1758.2index 87.30.5 fish/net set2011No record—
Ranked within standard summer july mn class 24 standard gill nets normal 1 5 to 7 3 catch per effort (fish per net set) — ranks restart at 1
1Collinwood LakeWright63999.7index 21,723.634 fish/net set2024No record—
2French LakeWright34666.4index 6,407.818.5 fish/net set2025No record—
3Cedar LakeWright79065.0index 9,61812.17 fish/net set2024No record—
4Bass LakeWright22262.2index 5,116.823 fish/net set2005No record—
5Buffalo LakeWright1,55256.6index 8,690.65.6 fish/net set2024No record—
6Limestone LakeWright23447.1index 2,96312.67 fish/net set2017No record—
7Beebe LakeWright32341.7index 2,799.48.67 fish/net set2016No record—
8Lake CharlotteWright25327.0index 1,262.65 fish/net set2017No record—
9Lake AnnWright37524.1index 1,4193.78 fish/net set2006No record—
10Constance LakeWright17513.7index 523.73 fish/net set2021No record—
11Granite LakeWright3620.0index 423.21.17 fish/net set1991No record—
Ranked within standard summer july mn class 30 standard gill nets normal 2 5 to 7 9 catch per effort (fish per net set) — ranks restart at 1
1Dutch LakeWright16282.8index 1,3268.17 fish/net set2016No record—
2Birch LakeWright10081.5index 1,073.110.75 fish/net set2009No record—
3Deer LakeWright17178.1index 1,325.77.75 fish/net set2013No record—
4Dean LakeWright17651.1index 936.95.33 fish/net set2019No record—
5Dog LakeWright970.0index 4514.67 fish/net set2006No record—
Ranked within standard summer august mn class 30 standard gill nets normal 2 5 to 7 9 catch per effort (fish per net set) — ranks restart at 1
1Deer LakeWright17192.4index 2,167.312.67 fish/net set2023No record—
2Birch LakeWright10084.7index 1,572.215.75 fish/net set1989No record—
3Dog LakeWright9762.9index 933.89.67 fish/net set2022No record—
4Dean LakeWright1760.0index 263.71.5 fish/net set1974No record—
Ranked within standard summer june mn class 24 standard gill nets normal 1 5 to 7 3 catch per effort (fish per net set) — ranks restart at 1
1Ida LakeWright226100.0index 3,908.417.33 fish/net set2022No record—
2Bass LakeWright22290.8index 3,559.516 fish/net set2017No record—
3Locke LakeWright14040.2index 1,609.711.5 fish/net set2016No record—
4French LakeWright3460.0index 1,271.23.67 fish/net set1979No record—
Ranked within standard summer june mn class 30 standard gill nets normal 2 5 to 7 9 catch per effort (fish per net set) — ranks restart at 1
1Brooks LakeWright10098.8index 2,10421 fish/net set2021No record—
2Fish LakeWright9725.7index 567.65.83 fish/net set2014No record—
3Lake MarthaWright10210.0index 273.52.67 fish/net set2022No record—
Comparable standard summer august mn class 22 standard gill nets normal 3 to 7 9 catch per effort (fish per net set) — one lake recorded, no peer rank
—Clearwater LakeWright3,187——6.5 fish/net set1980No record—
Comparable standard summer august mn class 27 standard gill nets normal 2 8 to 9 catch per effort (fish per net set) — one lake recorded, no peer rank
—Lake PulaskiWright813——10.25 fish/net set2025No record—
Comparable standard summer july mn class 22 standard gill nets normal 3 to 7 9 catch per effort (fish per net set) — one lake recorded, no peer rank
—Clearwater LakeWright3,187——13.53 fish/net set2019No record—
Comparable standard summer july mn class 38 standard gill nets normal 2 to 10 8 catch per effort (fish per net set) — one lake recorded, no peer rank
—Lake JohnWright397——9.56 fish/net set2016No record—
Comparable standard summer july mn class 39 standard gill nets normal 4 6 to 11 6 catch per effort (fish per net set) — one lake recorded, no peer rank
—Crawford LakeWright110——15 fish/net set2021No record—
Comparable standard summer july mn class 43 standard gill nets normal 1 1 to 8 catch per effort (fish per net set) — one lake recorded, no peer rank
—Little Waverly LakeWright338——9.67 fish/net set2024No record—
Comparable standard summer june mn class 43 standard gill nets normal 1 1 to 8 catch per effort (fish per net set) — one lake recorded, no peer rank
—Lake EmmaWright189——9.33 fish/net set2016No record—
Documented species evidence — unranked and alphabetical
—Lake UnionWright93————No record—

Methodology

How this list is built

County ranks use the same statewide exact-family contract; systems with at least two eligible county peers restart at #1. The score is 55% survey rate × acreage, 35% survey rate, and 10% recency. Catch-per-effort × acreage is only an opportunity index, never a literal fish count. Documented acreage plus verified public or shore access are eligibility gates. Unsupported methods stay documented but unranked. See the complete definitions on the statewide northern pike ranking.

FAQ

Wright County northern pike fishing FAQ

Which northern pike lakes receive a numeric county rank?

27 lakes receive at least one peer-backed, exact-lake numeric rank. Catch-per-effort systems separate species, phase, gear, unit, and sampled population; standardized adult-density estimates form their own system, so systems with at least two eligible county peers can each have a #1 in Wright County.

How many Wright County lakes have northern pike?

34 Wright County lakes have exact-water DNR survey evidence. Numeric rank still requires an exact comparable family plus the acreage and access gates.

Best northern pike lakes statewideBest musky in Wright CountyBest walleye in Wright CountyBest smallmouth bass in Wright CountyBest panfish in Wright CountyBest largemouth bass in Wright CountyAll Wright County lakes

Source data: Minnesota DNR LakeFinder fisheries surveys, lake classes, morphology, and public-access records. Rankings are LakeList's computed opinion from public agency data, not a DNR endorsement. Conditions and regulations change — verify access and rules before you go.